Archive for January, 2009

Logo Hispanicized

Posted by

Logo_cbs_news_2_600Is Logo becoming more hispanicized? “Hispanicize” is a term I have coined over the years and it has to do with making something a little more Hispanic/Latino. I was working from home the other day, one of my favorite company perks because it gives me the opportunity to have daytime TV in the background and learn new things; which is how I learned of Logo becoming a little more Hispanicized.

Monday morning, Logo aired a Latino coming out segment titled “Latino Beginnings.” In a reality TV format, like most forms of TV entertainment is nowadays, it followed three Latinos in their quest to come out to their mom in LA, run for student government president in New Mexico, and form part of the Latino Ball in Miami.

The three individuals made fantastic (and I mean fantastic only because they hit so close to home and were extremely real), cultural statements such as “being gay just shames the Hispanic family,” roughly translated, “you have to be macho and hard, and that’s just not typical of a feminine gay man,” and “our culture is one of machismo, getting tested for HIV is like the social admittance that you’re gay.”

Clearly, the program showcases the different social challenges of being a gay Hispanic even in the States. Last year, Logo aired a similar segment titled “Los Otros.”

The network is also producing a segment of sorts (I have not been able to find out more regarding this new program, so if you know what it’s about, please let me know) with Project Runway’s most liked or most detested candidate, Santino, and Latina icon, Charo. Charo is a native of Spain and has been a sensationalist actress /entertainer for decades known for her “cuchi cuchi coo.” To the surprise of many, it turns out that the talented woman actually knows how to play the classical guitar. You can see her in this QueerEdge (she has a decent gay fan base) interview.

Finally, that same evening, Logo was airing “Clandestinos.” A film set in Spain about a troubled teen that is infatuated with a separatist and tries to get his attention via a terrorist act. The film features a gay character and Logo played the Spanish version with English subtitles.

I find all of this programming extremely interesting and applaud Logo to no end for focusing on the Hispanic audience at this time of economic distress. Why the correlation? Well, during corporate budget cuts (which is no secret are taking place throughout the country) one of the first areas to lose funds for work is multicultural outreach, including  both Hispanic and gay and lesbian outreach. Instead of narrowing their audience to the “mass” majority market, Logo continues to expand its Hispanic programming to cast a wider net of viewers. Well done! I look forward to what is to come from Logo and the rest of our gay and lesbian media allies.

To Group or Not to Group?

Posted by

Pencils A common thread exists between the Hispanic community and the LGBT community: classification. Most Hispanics are not Hispanic and most LGBTs are not LGBTs.


Let’s start with the Hispanic community. Latino vs. Hispanic. Ahh, the eternal debate. To call us Latinos vs. Hispanics. There are many definitions for both terms: 
       Latino
           1 – a person of Latin-American descent
           2 – a person of  Spanish-speaking descent
           3 – a person’s who’s country of origin’s native tongue roots from Latin
       Hispanic
           1 – is used to refer to modern Spain
           2 – is used to refer to the Spanish-speaking nations of the Americas


It has been my experience that most consumers seem to think that the term Hispanic relates only to descendants of Spaniards, whereas the term Latino(a) refers to people from Latin America. As you can see from the definitions above, both assumptions are correct. I, personally, have always suspected a certain correlation between socioeconomic classes and the terms Latino, Hispanic and others such as Chicano. Lesson: use both Hispanic and Latino interchangeably. I try to do this in my work and casual conversations with people.


The greater challenge lies in the more than 10, even 20 places of origin that would classify someone as “Hispanic” or “Latino.” Cuban, Venezuelan, Mexican – we are all very different people, with extremely different traditions, cultures and even dialects – yeah – Spanish dialects!  You don’t hear the same “Spanish” in Texas, Northern Mexico or Central Mexico. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg! Although translation of certain English language material is usually a good first step, it doesn’t end there. Reaching Latinos/Hispanics across America takes a little more than that – a lot more, actually – but to keep this brief, it takes tailoring your material. A bit of psychology can also be effective in reaching your Hispanic target. For example, most (88%) Hispanics identify as their country of origin first instead of just “Hispanic.” Taking this information into account, a good message may use the word “Hispanic” but a better message may use the name of the country of origin “Ecuadorians…”


As marketing to Hispanics has grown in practice, we see this sort of “further segmentation” more and more in marketing plans. Our clients will now ask us to help them identify their re-defined Hispanic target (i.e., Mexican Americans in California vs. a more diverse audience in Miami – but with far less Mexican Americans, etc.)


In regards to LGBTs – well, there is a lot packaged into that acronym. Let’s take a closer look: 
    L – Lesbian – pertaining to, or characteristic of female homosexuality
    G – Gay – of, indicating, or supporting homosexual interests or a homosexual person esp. a male.
    B – Bisexual – sexually responsive to both sexes; ambisexual.
    T – Transgender - An umbrella term that refers to people whose biological and gender identity or expression may not be the same.


There are various definitions here and a lot of different characteristics, traditions, culture even family definitions and religions. If you are close to the “LGBT” community, you know there are “sub-categories” such as “queen,” “butch” and “femme”. Most members of the LGBT community will identify only as one of the descriptors that make up the acronym; some may identify themselves with two. Some conservative gays and lesbians (yes, they do exist) may cringe at the fact that the bisexuals and transgenders are included in their same grouping. It could be a major turnoff to generalize and group these vibrant and diverse individuals into one; just as it can be with the Hispanic community.


So, what now? How do you reach and connect with LGBTs? You can start by doing some homework. Talk to some experts. The good thing is that through the growth of LGBT marketing, we are already seeing the organic development of a guideline of sorts; just as it has with Hispanic marketing. We’ve  blogged about this a bit in the past as well. There is also some good research out there on how “LGBT’s” identify. For example, 60 percent of LGBT individuals prefer that marketers refer to the “community” as “Gay & Lesbian” according to a 2007 study from Community Marketing Inc. In another CMI report, a majority of Lesbians also prefer “that the community be addressed as ‘gay and lesbian.’”


The correlation within grouping between Hispanics and LGBTs is very clear. Both communities have communications preferences – some clear and other marginally preferred - so tailoring your messages and properly identifying your audience will make a stronger impact. By taking the time to change a couple of words in a message your message will become one of sensitivity, careful consideration and understanding of your consumer.


Keep checking back with us, and feel free to reach out individually. And of course, your insight, comments and perspectives are always welcome.


Image source

The Name Game

Posted by

Name calling j0433180 In case you haven’t checked your calendars, this is “No Name-Calling Week.”  That’s the designation of Jan 26-30, an observance that began five years ago by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN).

While every week should be free of name-calling, anyone who has survived adolescence knows that words get tossed around campus regularly and without regard to others’ feelings.

GLSEN has gone beyond a simple observance of that fact and provided school administrators and educators with the tools to increase visibility and awareness of the issue as well as open a dialogue among students this week and into the future. Best of all, there is no charge for the lesson plans that can be downloaded on the GLSEN site

With the incidents of “that’s so gay”  and name-calling itself – even in jest — in the workplace, possibly we as communicators can also look at the lesson plans as a guide to open dialogues in our own organizations.

GLAAD Announces 20th Annual Media Award Nominees

Posted by

Glaadlogo_v2_ntl_300dpi We’ve written before about the importance of LGBT visibility and its impact on everything from how we are perceived to how we are accepted in society. And we’ve also talked about the importance of honoring our own community. So I was really interested to see the press release today highlighting the nominees for the 20th Annual GLAAD Media Awards. 

According to the press release (written, I think at least in part, by Out Front Blog alumnus Rich Ferraro), "The GLAAD Media Awards recognize and honor media for their fair, accurate and inclusive representations of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community and the issues that affect their lives."

The list of nominees is much larger than I remember – 125 nominees in 26 English-language categories and 60 nominees in 16 Spanish-language categories. The list includes the expected (“Milk” for Outstanding Film – Wide Release and “Noah’s Arc: Jumping The Broom” for Outstanding Film – Limited Release) and a few surprises (my partner Mark’s favorite film “Shelter” up against “Noah’s Arc” and “Brideshead Revisted” up against “Milk”). MSNBC mainstays Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow are also nominated.

I was really pleased to see that "Brothers and Sisters" was nominated in the Outstanding Drama Series category (but it’s up against "The L Word" so I doubt it will win) and will be interested to see how ABC responds to the nomination for "Ugly Betty" since that network announced today that "Ugly Betty" will go on hiatus soon in favor of two sitcoms. Incidentally, ABC led all broadcast networks with six nominations and Logo led all cable networks with five nominations.

Read more »

A Gay Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum…

Posted by

EF_LogoHorizRev50 I recently received an e-mail about Equality Forum 2009, one of the LGBT community’s long-standing events. This year’s forum boasts more than 30 panels, 65 collaborative nonprofit partners and 40 LGBT leaders – all detailed on its newly designed Web site.

After perusing the site (and seriously considering attending), I stepped back and examined the intersection of communication channels and the message their sending to our community and the public at large. First, as trade shows and conferences across the country experience a decrease in glitz and guests attending or cancelation thanks to the economy, Equality Forum’s strong panel line-ups, special events and length speak to its importance and support by the LGBT business and civic community. While largely stereotypical, Equality Forum 2009’s potential of strong attendance and tourism spend in Philadelphia reconfirms the importance of the LGBT dollar in a down or up economy.

Read more »