Posts Tagged ‘Pop Culture’

More From Nick Vivion and Unicorn Booty on LGBT Communications in the Age of Social Media

Posted by Bryan Blaise

And we're back today with the second half of our conversation with Unicorn Booty's Nick Vivion about his business, the LGBT consumer and social media. And speaking of leveraging digital and social media for the gays, take a look at the video at the end of this post and a recent write-up on how Nick and his partner Kevin are using social media to help uncover the reason behind YouTube's selective removal of their video today.

5. Besides Unicorn Booty, what are your thoughts on how businesses should communicate with and engage with LGBT consumers? Is digital and social media the best channel?

Unicorn Booty is of course the only way to reach LGBT consumers.

Of course that's not true!  I am platform agnostic – just use what works.  What works for us is all digital and social media. Why pay $50,000 for a full-page ad in the Advocate when you can create an interactive experience that really engages your target audience for a fraction of the price? The majority of other media – print and television – are over-priced and not as effective.  People keep doing them because that's the status quo, but you really can't measure the impact of a print ad beyond circulation. The exciting (and very scary!) thing about digital/social media is that you can measure everything! You know how long someone spent on the site, where they want, if they bought anything.  You know what they think of your brand. It's all right there, and you can't hide from it.  That makes advertising much harder, because rather than just doing a "media buy" and crossing your fingers, you actually have to deliver results.

The funny thing about this tension between traditional and new media is that many businesses are still stuck in a sales mentality.  Will it drive sales? Will it boost my revenue? This is a dangerous mentality to have, because social media is about less tangible relationship marketing.  There are 1.37 billion influence impressions online every day (Forrester).  It's not just about sales, it's being a part of a whole new world where priorities have shifted from your desire to sell to your customer's desire to be engaged. You are not always going to be able to measure the sales impact of your social media efforts, but you CAN measure engagement, which lays out the path to increased brand awareness, affinity and authenticity as you meet consumers on their terms.  

6. What challenges have you experienced or seen other businesses face when communicating with the LGBT market?

As I mentioned earlier, the LGBT market is diverse.  You cannot create one campaign "for the gays" and expect it to resonate community-wide.  That's dangerous territory, and if you haven't ever marketed to the LGBT community before get some help!  If you offend the community, it has a very long-term memory.  So go slow, think twice and ask someone who knows what their doing!

For us, our biggest challenge is distilling our message down to its core so that it resonates with the widest swath of the LGBT community as possible.  We really do want to appeal to the community as a whole.  For us to succeed in our mission to strengthen our community through supporting gay-friendly businesses, we need to have as many people as possible on-board.  Once we reach the tipping point, it becomes increasingly impossible for businesses to have an anti-gay agenda.  $825 billion is a lot of money: A bailout-sized chunk of cash ready to be put behind equality-minded businesses.  
Communicating this vision is the most challenging thing facing us right now, because it applies to both our interactions with consumers and the companies that we are contacting about being featured on our site.  We need the consumers to come back every day to check out the day's partner, and we need the companies to see the value in the market.  Both sides have an interest in seeing those gay dollars at work: Consumers want to see them being used positively in the community, and businesses want to see them being spent on their products.  UB is in charge of bringing this vision to both stakeholders.

7. Tell us more about your social responsibility component. Is this a crucial element for businesses engaging with LGBT consumers? How should a business communicate that or its advocacy efforts?

We give 10% of our net proceeds to a different community-chosen non-profit every quarter.  This quarter it's Seattle's Lifelong AIDS Alliance. My experience with the Mormons during No on 8 drove this decision, because I saw first-hand what can be accomplished when an entire community gives 10% of their income. People with anti-gay agendas are already giving 10% to organizations that exist to reduce our status in the world, so if we don't also give 10% then they will win, every time.  So we call our 10% commitment our "gay tithe," and are hoping to popularize the concept as we lead by example.  10% of $825 billion is $8.25 billion.  To put that into perspective, that is enough money to put every single LGBT person in the USA through private college.  If you consider what could be done with a simple 10% commitment, it's astounding.

With a community that has experienced long-term discrimination, and who is still not enjoying full equality, a socially responsible component can be a vital component to engaging LGBT consumers.  It gives you another marketing tool, but it also demonstrates that you understand the challenges still facing the community. It sends a clear message that you empathize and are committed to doing something about it.  It also differentiates you from any competition and places you more firmly in the community.
Communicating your commitment to advocacy or a particular non-profit should be secondary to your main value proposition.  You do not want to be seen as giving to a non-profit only for the good-will and self-interest of your company.  You must come at it from the heart, and mention it in a tasteful but obvious way.  You don't want to hide it, but you don't want it to be your primary selling point either.  It should be an added benefit, something that makes the consumer choose you over your competition when faced with a decision.  This doesn't mean that you shouldn't leverage the hell out of it on the back-end: Contact stakeholders, befriend members of the organization you have partnered with, use your commitment to the organization to recruit evangelists, ask the organization if you can participate in any events they have going on.  For example, we will be MCing at a Lifelong AIDS Alliance rooftop benefit next week – a great opportunity for visibility that works even better due to our 10% commitment to that organization.
We want to demonstrate that new entrepreneurs can build a successful and sustainable business while still giving 10%.  It's not necessarily a gay thing, but a human being thing.  We all have to be part of the solution, regardless of what we do for a living.

Washington Boys & California Gurls – a Music Video by Unicorn Booty from Booty the Unicorn on Vimeo.

That Newsweek story…

Posted by Michael Murphy

So everyone is talking about the Newsweek story. To describe it in one sentence or less, the writer (gay himself) said that openly gay actors struggle to convincingly play straight characters. He referenced both Sean Hayes performance in the revival of Promises, Promises  and Jonathan Groff from Glee as two examples of not hitting the straight mark. It's fair to say that this article, and the response to it, has been a media explosion.

Let me give my two cents. I saw Promises, Promises last weekend, and I consider myself a Gleek. I was underwhelmed by Promises, Promises,  and my friend who went with me to see it agreed that the major problem was Sean Hayes. It's not about his acting skills, or his credibility, but for my generation, he is iconically known for Jack McFarland. Good or bad, once you put such an indelible stamp on pop culture like Hayes did for almost a decade on mainstream television, it is hard to separate yourself from your character. There were so many moments during the show where Sean slipped into Jack, whether he knew it or not. From head bobbing while dancing to his impeccable delivery of lines, there was so much Jack in him. And I think audiences came to see Jack on stage. So was he convincing as a straight man pining for a woman? No- but it's not because he is gay– it is because he made such an impression playing a gay man and his mannerisms from that character melded into this new performance. Plus the source material, not so great. It's not exactly the most macho role to begin with.

The Jonathan Groff example from Glee is interesting.  I saw Groff's breakout role in Spring Awakening on Broadway, and whether he was out or not at the time, he wasn't on my radar. His performance was so moving as a troubled teen in love that I didn't think twice about his sexuality. Now he is on Glee, and it is only now that I know he is gay. Does that make him less convincing on the show, where he pines for Rachel? No– because the two of them have such established chemistry, and no offense, but the show is about show choirs, where my experience (three years in high school) is that everyone is flamboyantly fabulous, no matter their sexuality.

So maybe the Newsweek writer was't eloquent in the point he was trying to make. But I think the point he is making is valid. Once you come out in Hollywood, it becomes part of who you are moving forward. It is the"talking point" about you. Every interviewer will ask about it, every studio casting director will think twice about it before casting you. The fact is, in my opinion, that there are probably hundreds of actors currently in the medium playing straight while being gay, and they are doing it convincingly. The sad part is that the culture is just not quite there yet to allow someone to come out without suffering professionally. Yes there are positive cases here and there, but there are certainly also cases where the impact is deafening.

Where I struggle the most with the Newsweek story is the tone of the backlash. We come from a community where we are labeled, good or bad. It's one thing for us to disagree with someone, but it's a whole different story for us to be vicious in attacking because of a difference of opinion and to put labels like "homophobic" on someone who is a member of our own community. It saddens me that sometimes, LGBT or straight, we feel that the best way to get our opposing viewpoint across is to scream it. This might come from the 24-hour cable news cycle, full of pundits who challenge each other every night to see who can speak the loudest. And believe me, I understand that our voice has been silenced for so long, and that we are still oppressed in many circumstances. But civility is so fleeting in an age where we can instantly share our opinions to the world.

So what's the lesson in all of this? I do love freedom of speech, for both the opportunity to share your opinion and to react to others. But when the dialogue becomes so weighted in viciousness, it becomes a battle with no winners.

Most people who reacted to the original story did not read the entire piece, instead focusing on the backlash. Read it first, and tell me what you think. Do you agree?

Have a peaceful weekend.

GLAAD for the Glee-ful Single Drag Racers

Posted by Michael Murphy

Happy Monday! Or, I can't believe it's Monday! Spent the weekend on domestic chores as the BF is trapped in Germany due to the volcano. I swear it feels like a really cheesy Lifetime movie– he's trapped over there, and I am left having to mow the lawn. And my swearing while mowing was very similar to a volcanic eruption. Come home soon.

Speaking of things important to me– Glee has its Madonna-centric episode this week, and I could not be more excited! Even Madonna loves the show (about Madonna!). Those kids on Glee must be the hardest working cast in show business, and the accolades keep on coming in. On Saturday night, the show picked up the "Outstanding Comedy Series" award from GLAAD as part of the 21st Annual GLAAD Media Awards in Los Angeles. No surprise here– Glee is one of the most progressive shows in terms of portraying the LGBT community in a positive– and realistic– light, whether that means showing how Kurt deals with being openly gay in high school, or how Rachel is raised by her two dads. Any show-choir themed show has an inherent LGBT story to tell, and I am proud of creator Ryan Murphy, and for GLAAD, for recognizing the invaluable opportunity Tuesday nights at 9PM can provide.

Glee wasn't the only entertainment program recognized on Saturday night. The film A Single Man picked up an award for "Outstanding Film," and RuPaul's Drag Race scored for "Outstanding Reality Program." Both Drew Barrymore and Wanda Sykes also picked up awards for their commitment to our community, and Telemundo walked away with recognition for Spanish-language journalism segment.

GLAAD has really turned these awards into a forum for discussing how important it is for the media and entertainment worlds to accurately portray, and include, the LGBT community in programming and news coverage. While these awards have the glitz and glamour of Hollywood red carpet events, there is an important educational overlay into using media coverage…of media coverage.. to spread GLAAD's mission of promoting and ensuring fair, accurate and inclusive representation of people and events in the media as a means of eliminating homophobia and discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation. Thank you GLAAD!

P.S. Super-excited that the mega-LGBT musical, La Cage Aux Follies opened to rave reviews last night on Broadway. This means that we have yet another forum to talk about the importance of owning and respecting the LGBT identity. As the song from the musical goes, "I am what I am, and what I am needs no excuses." Checking out the show in May– so I will let you know how it is!

Have a great week.

(Photo courtesy of 2010 Chris Weeks/WireImage)  

 

Do You Give a Damn?

Posted by Erin Grohs

On April 1, Cyndi Lauper’s True Colors Fund launched the Give A Damn Campaign, a Web-based program seeking to educate and engage the straight community to help advance LGBT equality. The Give a Damn Campaign is for anyone who cares about LGBT equality, but as Lauper tells us, it’s particularly for the straight community. It doesn’t matter if you’re an active supporter or a first-timer or someone that hasn’t paid much attention to LGBT issues, the Give a Damn Campaign offers a way to help you get informed and get involved.

The slickly designed site, which is incredibly easy to navigate, also features a blog delivering LGBT news , items related to equality and specific ways to get involved. There is also a video section (including the one shown below) offering short clips of celebrities like Whoopi Goldberg, Elton John and the awesome Anna Paquin (who caused quite a stir this week) expressing why they care about equality, as well as a page with explanations on issues currently facing the LGBT community like workplace discrimination and the current state of gay marriage. One of my favorite parts, and a very smart addition to the site, is the “Personal Stories” tab, which allows visitors to share their thoughts on a variety of topics, including the military and faith. Easy tags for Facebook, Google and Twitter, as well as the handy “Tell a Friend” button make it simple for users to share information in any way they choose.

The Web site is bold and incredibly interactive, using Lauper’s signature look and distinct voice to urge site visitors to check out particular links and to join the campaign. Once you register, you can choose the issues you are most interested in but for me, the best part is that Lauper (who looks FANTASTIC) personally thanks you for “giving a damn.” It’s a very savvy way to add a personal touch to the site and the campaign, and for a fan such as myself, it makes me feel like a valued and important member of the program. The boldness of the campaign and the rich content on the site is prompting me to get MORE involved…and I’m already a die-hard, loud-mouthed straight ally.

So, watch the video. Visit the site. Join the campaign. Please show it to your friends, parents, co-workers, neighbors, mailman – anyone. Let’s get informed, get involved and most importantly, let’s give a damn – loudly and proudly.

(Photo courtesy of www.wegiveadamn.org)

It’s Affirmative: Martin’s Coming Out Holds Lesson for LGBT Communicators

Posted by Bryan Blaise

Yes. He's gay. On Monday, March 29, via his personal Web site and Twitter handle, Latin and pop music sensation Ricky Martin came out as a gay man, performer and father. Affirming suspicions, questions and rumors that have plagued the performer for years, Martin very simply and eloquently confirmed his sexuality.

That day, the gay blogosphere lit up as did social media sites, like Facebook and Twitter. While media was a little more tempered in their coverage of the singer's announcement, social media posts and statuses echoed sentiments like this: "Ricky Martin's gay? That's not news. We've all known for years."

Maybe because I was one of those cases where others knew before me, or maybe because I tend to be more empathetic, but these posts from friends and social media strangers got me riled up. I begin to think about two aspects: affirmation and confirmation. I specifically was interested in both of these elements role in communications around a person's coming out and in general communications to gays and lesbians every day.

Obviously, the act of confirming one's sexuality("coming out") is a deeply personal journey — different for each LGBT individual. It takes courage and can carry with it emotions and consequences that many of our straight counterparts won't have to or can't understand. It's something that, no matter peers', family's or society's suspicions, still requires a confirmation, an affirmative statement on behalf of the individual coming out. And whether at 13 or 30, that decision should be respected.

Affirmation, however, is the bigger component and lesson for LGBT communicators. All people like to be affirmed for who they are and what they stand for. By their parents, their colleagues, their bosses, their religious leaders — it is a natural human desire to be recognized for all that you are and are striving towards. This is especially true for out LGBT people though. The struggle with coming to terms with one's own self is only magnified when it is not affirmed by our community or downplayed after our confirmation.

In LGBT communications, whether marketing a product/service or simply sharing your thoughts over a cup of coffee, remember the importance of affirmation. Appreciate the journey of that person's self-discovery and continually recognize them for the out individual they are. The benefits to them and you are priceless.

One final thought on Martin: take a look at GLAAD's statement on the Martin's coming out. While each individual coming out story has value and importance, some have an impact to large communities and cultures. I applaud GLAAD for recognizing that, affirming Martin's decision and elevating his example to a large community without many out role models.

Congrats, Ricky. Continue living Out Front and best wishes to you and your children.