Happy Monday. I know I promised a post-Oscar analysis today, but I am so depressed about the show itself that I can't even begin to put my thoughts on electronic paper. This was a career first for me– going to bed before it was even over. It was a predictable snooze fest, though I did enjoy seeing all of those 1980s icons dragged out of the closet for a random tribute to John Hughes.
Before he jetted off to vacation bliss, Bryan shared an interesting blog post which made me smile that Ohio smile. Ohio State football is a religion here in Ohio…in fact in the Midwest. Weekend games are apparently an event not to be missed. If I followed organized athletics, I am sure I'd be all up in that Buckeye grill.
So the coach of the team gave a recent interview to our local LGBT outlet Outlook. Described in the piece as a conservative Christian and Bush supporter, Coach Jim Tressel was asked about how he would handle a situation where one of his players came out to him. To quote:
"We strive to teach and model appreciation for everyone. One, we are a family. If you haven't learned form your family at home that people have differences and those strengthen the whole, then you are hopefully going to learn it as a part of the Ohio State football family.
Two, every part of our team is important and every role has value – no job is too small and no person is irrelevant – that's a great lesson that transcends society. When I think of the diversity on our team the past few years, it goes way beyond just a racial, sexual or ethnic mix…Whatever a young man feels called to express, I hope we will help him do it in a supportive environment."
Wow. Kudos to Ohio State University for participating in this media opportunity for two reasons. One, it's a smart, and progressive, recruiting strategy to target LGBT athletes by engaging in a space that they know and trust. Two, according to the outlet, it's the first time a coach of a Division 1 football team has been interviewed in the LGBT space.
I'm certain that the Coach, and the school, will receive some negative pushback both internally and externally for participating in the interview and for being so open and inclusive of athletes. However, I think this article does more good than harm, and I applaud the University and its media relations team for recognizing a valuable marketing strategy when they see one.
What do you think about the article? Would you be more likely to go to a game knowing that the coach was an honorary member of "the team"?
Have a good week.


